tvb.com

 
 
tvb.com
 

最想/最唔想睇邊個演岀?點解?

最想睇黃浩然
86
最想睇陳煒
42
最唔想睇陳煒
6
最想睇傅嘉莉
14
最唔想睇傅嘉莉
42
最想睇洪永城
35
最唔想睇洪永城
61
最想睇黃翠如
60
最唔想睇黃翠如
46
其他,請説明
7

總票數 Total Votes: 399

最想/最唔想睇邊個演岀?點解?

如題。

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-13 22:02

Sai1234
帖數 Posts: 343
回頂端 / Top
我最想睇黃浩然,因為佢同好多拍檔都有火花。當年佢病咗,演唔到「張保仔」,真係令我覺得套劇失色咗。好在主角煎pan撐塲,如果唔係套劇都唔知點收科。So far 啲票係堅嘅,觀眾明顯鍾意睇黃浩然。趁住打手未殺到,大家快啲投票。TVB為咗捧佢想捧嘅人,無所不用其技。

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-14 1:23

Sai1234
帖數 Posts: 343
回頂端 / Top
最想睇黃浩然,因為佢同好多拍檔都有火花。當年佢病咗,演唔到「張保仔」,真係令我覺得套劇失色咗。好在主角煎pan撐塲,如果唔係套劇都唔知點收科。So far 啲票係堅嘅,觀眾明顯鍾意睇黃浩然。趁住打手未殺到,大家快啲投票。TVB為咗捧佢想捧嘅人,無所不用其技。
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
喔,樓上的好朋友,我真是和你心有靈犀!!你完全說出我內心的感受!!說得好!!

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-14 6:53

merrychen
帖數 Posts: 1693
回頂端 / Top
喔,樓上的好朋友,我真是和你心有靈犀!!你完全說出我內心的感受!!說得好+1

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-14 8:27

潴小茵
帖數 Posts: 101
回頂端 / Top
嗱嗱嗱,話咁快打手殺到嚟嘞,睇吓翠如BB啲票, 忽然追得黃浩然啲票幾貼。

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-14 13:18

Sai1234
帖數 Posts: 343
回頂端 / Top
支持黄翠如,洪永城就係打手?有冇搞錯?人哋都有好多支持者㗎,不過可能係沉黙嘅一群唔想咁無聊咁無知同你地嘈咋!

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-14 13:52

daddeyaa
帖數 Posts: 954
回頂端 / Top
冇.....黄翠如...洪永城.........我未必睇 !
冇.....黄翠如...洪永城.........我未必睇 !
冇.....黄翠如...洪永城.........我未必睇 !

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-14 14:08

leeyukkong
帖數 Posts: 6168
回頂端 / Top
Daddeyaa, 你講得有你嘅道理,當然有真fans. 但無可否認亦真係有打手,「嘈」嘅定義見仁見智,每人應包容別人有唔同意見。

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-14 14:17

Sai1234
帖數 Posts: 343
回頂端 / Top
Seela madame (staring Priscilla Wong) finishes 2nd in rating in 2015. Last year, Priscilla's drama finishes better than Tin's cat show and Roger's revenge show were broadcast around the same time, But there were a lot more people on this forum rooting for Tin and Roger. So why not those for Roger and Tin are hit hands? Priscilla has lots of sponsorships and invitations as I follow her news and Facebook.

You by yourself can easily fake the less than 30 votes here. But you can't fake the millions of viewership rating. You also cant fake spinsorships or invitations. When viewership reflects a much better response than that fron this forum, it means the positive response is real, not by hit-hands. She may attract the more mature professional working class who does not have time to bla bla bla a lot.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-14 21:20

beautifulRuth
帖數 Posts: 807
回頂端 / Top
Beautiful Ruth, I agree with you to a certain extent cuz I do think there should be a lot of Priscilla's fans as time goes by. Personally, I like her better than Tin too. Yet, it's undeniable that the "hit-hands" do existed, cuz many times I notice whenever there're way too many negative comments of a certain artist or drama, the walls were suddenly deleted and replaced by many topics with positive comments. Wired, eh? BTW, I'm skeptical if Priscilla tend to attract the "professional working class" more than the "Blah, blah, blah audiences", unless there's a given digit from a reliable source. Instead, as far as I know, there're many mature audiences with higher moralities dislike Priscilla, ever since she stripped and took a bath with her boyfriend in her last drama. Even though it's just a drama, it's not suitable for TVB to broadcast this kind of sexually explicit scene, especially during the high peak hours whilst kids might also be watching together.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-15 6:08

Sai1234
帖數 Posts: 343
回頂端 / Top
成班老是常岀現演員,睇到一啲追看力都冇

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-15 21:59

mb_85295539609_568934b982812
帖數 Posts: 15
回頂端 / Top
唔覚黃浩然常出現

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-15 22:42

潴小茵
帖數 Posts: 101
回頂端 / Top
最想睇黃浩然,因為佢同好多拍檔都有火花。當年佢病咗,演唔到「張保仔」,真係令我覺得套劇失色咗。好在主角煎pan撐塲,如果唔係套劇都唔知點收科。So far 啲票係堅嘅,觀眾明顯鍾意睇黃浩然。趁住打手未殺到,大家快啲投票。TVB為咗捧佢想捧嘅人,無所不用其技。
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
喔,樓上的好朋友,我真是和你心有靈犀!!你完全說出我內心的感受!!說得好!! x 2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
雖然有時黃浩然做男二,但佢仍然能夠將角色演得好,有感染力,每次不同的角色佢都能發揮得好好,幾喜歡睇佢嘅演技;知道佢因病演唔到張保仔,錯失一次一個有實力同陳展鵬互鬥演技嘅機會,覺得係觀眾嘅損失。

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 0:19

emiumiu
帖數 Posts: 26
回頂端 / Top
Sai1234,

Yes, hit hands for sure but don't think they are specific for Priscilla.

As for morality, I don't understand your standard. Pal Sinn dumped his wife and ignored his daughter for years and running a gambling house, but he was portrayed as a hero, and ppl are OK with that. I think only me and a couple other posters complained with no one responding to us. There are also artists in real life who have had affairs and ppl are OK with that. Tin even killed Ah Wing (even though Ah Wing only knew about the bribes but not the murder and had no evidence), but ppl feel sorry for her. So Priscilla had a bathing scene with her husband (in the show) not revealing anything, and ppl dislike her for immorality? Su Ki got completely naked and did really gross sex thing but had tons of fans. There are all these Christians who got pregnant before marriage and ppl are OK. But if a wife took a bath and had sex with her husband, that us immorality? ?

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 2:27

Woopi
帖數 Posts: 849
回頂端 / Top
Beauty Ruth,

I don't think Priscilla has a lot of sponsorships or invitations. Which sponsors? I also don't think her fans are necessary professional who don't bla bla bka. Your thinking is very snobby thinking. Professionals sometimes gossip and bla bla bLA the most. Just because a person gets a better job, it does not mean he or she is more noble. What a person says on the forum has to do with who the person is, not what jobs he or she has.

This world has become crazy...people holding wrong values...or I am going crazy fighting with everyone in this thread...

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 2:39

Woopi
帖數 Posts: 849
回頂端 / Top
I personally don't like Priscilla ever since her father's company went public and the stock price went up 100 fold or sth. The P/E ratio of her father's company now exceeds even the highest growing industry and companies like FB. Does people know what P/E and growth rate mean? Priscilla should never have used her star influence to boost the stock price and her father. Many people would have to lose a lot of money when the bubble bursts. I really hate people who get rich by taking the money of the stupid or innocent ordinary men, and still feels proud of it. So bad. Don't like her anymore.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 2:48

Woopi
帖數 Posts: 849
回頂端 / Top
Hong ... I am OK with him LA. He is quite ugly but that is not his fault MA. Actually, I like him because as an ugly STAR, he has to work so much harder and has a much higher EQ. Also, Natalie Tong says he is an independent thinker. I don't think he ducks up to Yu. PRISCILLA was caught on photos for hanging out with Yu, but not Hong. I think Yu uses him to build up her power. But he just accepts it as anyone would.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 2:52

Woopi
帖數 Posts: 849
回頂端 / Top
Woopi, thanks for your response. Actually, I regret about some of the posts I've left on this wall cuz I think many wordings I've used were too harsh. My original intention was to express how I feel about Priscilla but not to condemn her. Be honest, I used to like her cuz I think she's very pure, until she played her last role which contains mature subject matter, I started to doubt if she's a real Christian. Let me explain why I feel this way: 'Let's assume that we're Christians and we have a daughter, will we permit her to play that role Priscilla played in her last drama?' I don't know what others think but in my morality, this is absolutely a "No", that is it. Regarding other artists, I do agree with you that there're way too many artists who claim they're Christians but do many things that contrary to their beliefs, thus I wonder if they're faked Christians. I haven't heard about what Priscilla father did but if it's a fact, that's really disgusting.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 5:37

Sai1234
帖數 Posts: 343
回頂端 / Top
I think Priscilla is a good and pure person and although she may have been in what is so called a "sexually explicit scene", I don't think it goes against Christianity because as an actress, it is part of her job and is performed in a very professional way. I think in fact, she should be praised for her willingness to be in such a scene because it greatly demonstrates her professionalism as an actress. You may think it goes against Christianity but I truly believe that the scene does not make her any less of Christian.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 5:49

2stepsfromheaven
帖數 Posts: 7
回頂端 / Top
BTW, I'm ok with Hong too, he did well in "Rear Mirror" and I believe that being given him with more opportunities, he can polish his acting and earn more popularity.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 6:01

Sai1234
帖數 Posts: 343
回頂端 / Top
In no offence, but I still persist that a Christian isn't morally acceptable to play a role that contains mature subject matter. Anyways, that's just my point of view, and I respect the perspectives of each individual, even though we're not on the same page. In fact, Woopi, you've well said that "Shu Ke got completely naked and did really gross sex thing on the movie but still has tons of fans",so we can see that for some people, what she does is entirely acceptable, she's just being professional as an actress, no matter which role she's asked to play, she's still their pure goddess. In the same manner, shouldn't we be fair to look at Priscilla in the same manner, should we? Well, I'm confused. Instead, there's so much noises from the parents, about the loving making part in Priscilla's last drama. It's completely understandable cuz there're limits of censorship on "TV", parents worry it'll arouse the sexual curiosities of their kids, especially the very young ones.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-16 23:16

Sai1234
帖數 Posts: 343
回頂端 / Top
I don't know what is acceptable as Christian or not acceptable. When I really read the Bible from start to end for the first time, reading it as it is, not through the lens of our cultural values or church teaching, i realize that everyone (including pastors) just picKs and chooses whatever fits their own values aND emphasize on those parts, while deemphasizing parts that don't fit their desired image of how they want God to be. Then even within the Bible, there are many conflicts because our human minds are limited and cannot fully understand God (as the Bible itself says in Deuteronomy and Isiah and also by Paul). So I think the teaching on not to judge is really right because all the Christians are missing the bar. But somehow Christians all think more highly of themselves and self righteousness and like to judge others.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-17 21:53

Woopi
帖數 Posts: 849
回頂端 / Top
Now there is a difference between judging others and speaking up for justice for the poor and oppressed (which the Bible has repeatedly taught). The former involves judging a person's conduct (which is not harming the poor or the oppressed) while not lifting a single figer to help. The latter involves fighting for the poor and oppressed by condemning the injustice and actually putting in action to help.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-17 22:04

Woopi
帖數 Posts: 849
回頂端 / Top
So, I don't understand why parents are not worried that drug traffickers (to save one's own business) are portrayed as heroes but that a husband and wife have sex. Why aren't Christian parents spending time on reading the Bible and praying and talking with their children one hour per day instead of spending that hour on junk TV shows? Why not use the time to make some sandwiches or even just hot tea or cold lemonate to feed the poor and homeless? Or even on exercising? Or on visiting the lonely adults at nursing homes or at their homes p to share the gospel and love? Or on singing hymns?

No, but Christian parents prefer to watch TV with their kids and then blame TVB for teaching their kids sex? I hope these Christian parents can boldly stand in front of God (if they really believe in a real God instead of religion tailored to their favours) on judgement day to give an account on how they have followed to the Bible to raise their children to be good Christians by condemning TVB

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-17 22:06

Woopi
帖數 Posts: 849
回頂端 / Top
Simply put, I can't see any God or Holy Spirit in 99% of Christians. At best, I see their religious teaching (no better than other religious teachong) which is good for some people. So I don't think Christians should be spending so much time on condemning and judging others. After all, Jesus said "Christians" who don't go to Heaven are the rich who don't feed the hungry, give water to the thirsty, cloth the naked, care for the widows and orphans, visit the prisoners...(extend to modern society, it is about helping the poor, the outcast, the marginalized, etc).

The only commandments are to love our neighbours (as ourselves, not the different love defined by Christians) and God.

There is honestly very little on asking Christians to condemn other Christians or non Christians in public when it does not concern social justice.

發表於 Posted on: 2017-03-17 22:32

Woopi
帖數 Posts: 849
回頂端 / Top